Composing generators
@composed
While Supposition.jl provides basic generators for a number of objects from Base, quite a lot of Julia code relies on the use of custom structs. At the innermost level, all Julia structs are composed of one or more of these basic types, like Int, String, Vector etc. Of course, we want to be able to generate & correctly shrink these custom structs as well, so how can this be done? Enter @composed, which can do exactly that. Here's how it's used:
using Supposition
const intgen = Data.Integers{Int}()
makeeven(x) = (x÷0x2)*0x2
even_complex = @composed function complex_even(a=intgen, b=intgen)
a = makeeven(a)
b = makeeven(b)
a + b*im
end
example(even_complex, 5)5-element Vector{Complex{Int64}}:
-8253554537227320318 + 1332295991005773182im
4329201426698000776 - 8372896810465936208im
3191593622639125548 - 562184370714768762im
2429276616221882930 + 3626136125343804496im
-3929921364404410424 - 6299869892752602594imIn essence, @composed takes a function that is given some generators, and ultimately returns a generator that runs the function on those given generators. As a full-fledged Possibility, you can of course do everything you'd expect to do with other Possibility objects from Supposition.jl, including using them as input to other @composed! This makes them a powerful tool for composing custom generators.
@check function all_complex_even(c=even_complex)
iseven(real(c)) && iseven(imag(c))
endThe inferred type of objects created by a generator from @composed is a best effort and may be wider than expected. E.g. if the input generators are non-const globals, it can easily happen that type inference falls back to Any. The same goes for other type instabilities and the usual best-practices surrounding type stability.
In addition, @composed defines the function given to it as well as a regular function, which means that you can call & reuse it however you like:
complex_even(1.0,2.0)0.0 + 2.0imFiltering, mapping, and other combinators
filter
Of course, manually marking, mapping or filtering inside of @composed is sometimes a bit too much. For these cases, all Possibility support filter and map, returning a new Data.Satisfying or Data.Map Possibility respectively:
using Supposition
intgen = Data.Integers{UInt8}()
f = filter(iseven, intgen)
example(f, 10)10-element Vector{UInt8}:
0x5e
0xf2
0xc2
0x66
0x58
0x8a
0x5c
0xc0
0xde
0xe6Note that filtering is, in almost all cases, strictly worse than constructing the desired objects directly. For example, if the filtering predicate rejects too many examples from the input space, it can easily happen that no suitable examples can be found:
g = filter(>(typemax(UInt8)), intgen)
example(g, 10)ERROR: Tried sampling 100000 times, without getting a result. Perhaps you're filtering out too many examples?It is best to only filter when you're certain that the part of the state space you're filtering out is not substantial.
map
In order to make it easier to directly construct conforming instances, you can use map, transforming the output of one Possibility into a different object:
using Supposition
intgen = Data.Integers{UInt8}()
makeeven(x) = (x÷0x2)*0x2
m = map(makeeven, intgen)
example(m, 10)10-element Vector{UInt8}:
0x6a
0x40
0x28
0xee
0x4a
0x72
0x10
0xea
0x2c
0xcc