Composing generators
@composed
While Supposition.jl provides basic generators for a number of objects from Base, quite a lot of Julia code relies on the use of custom structs. At the innermost level, all Julia structs are composed of one or more of these basic types, like Int
, String
, Vector
etc. Of course, we want to be able to generate & correctly shrink these custom structs as well, so how can this be done? Enter @composed
, which can do exactly that. Here's how it's used:
using Supposition
const intgen = Data.Integers{Int}()
makeeven(x) = (x÷0x2)*0x2
even_complex = @composed function complex_even(a=intgen, b=intgen)
a = makeeven(a)
b = makeeven(b)
a + b*im
end
example(even_complex, 5)
5-element Vector{Complex{Int64}}:
2039250369958159498 - 5351598215399239502im
-3577491071005366610 - 4476213672568630062im
8190652638782828060 + 8341451288263644814im
-3650148928031328650 + 5066447988930209878im
-2437974777491117090 + 7705698290406928824im
In essence, @composed
takes a function that is given some generators, and ultimately returns a generator that runs the function on those given generators. As a full-fledged Possibility
, you can of course do everything you'd expect to do with other Possibility
objects from Supposition.jl, including using them as input to other @composed
! This makes them a powerful tool for composing custom generators.
@check function all_complex_even(c=even_complex)
iseven(real(c)) && iseven(imag(c))
end
The inferred type of objects created by a generator from @composed
is a best effort and may be wider than expected. E.g. if the input generators are non-const
globals, it can easily happen that type inference falls back to Any
. The same goes for other type instabilities and the usual best-practices surrounding type stability.
In addition, @composed
defines the function given to it as well as a regular function, which means that you can call & reuse it however you like:
complex_even(1.0,2.0)
0.0 + 2.0im
Filtering, mapping, and other combinators
filter
Of course, manually marking, mapping or filtering inside of @composed
is sometimes a bit too much. For these cases, all Possibility
support filter
and map
, returning a new Data.Satisfying
or Data.Map
Possibility
respectively:
using Supposition
intgen = Data.Integers{UInt8}()
f = filter(iseven, intgen)
example(f, 10)
10-element Vector{UInt8}:
0x58
0xca
0x40
0x80
0xd6
0x26
0xcc
0x2c
0x32
0x0e
Note that filtering is, in almost all cases, strictly worse than constructing the desired objects directly. For example, if the filtering predicate rejects too many examples from the input space, it can easily happen that no suitable examples can be found:
g = filter(>(typemax(UInt8)), intgen)
example(g, 10)
ERROR: Tried sampling 100000 times, without getting a result. Perhaps you're filtering out too many examples?
It is best to only filter when you're certain that the part of the state space you're filtering out is not substantial.
map
In order to make it easier to directly construct conforming instances, you can use map
, transforming the output of one Possibility
into a different object:
using Supposition
intgen = Data.Integers{UInt8}()
makeeven(x) = (x÷0x2)*0x2
m = map(makeeven, intgen)
example(m, 10)
10-element Vector{UInt8}:
0xc4
0x10
0xde
0x14
0xf0
0x22
0x4a
0x5a
0xbe
0x02
The inferred type of objects created by a generator from map
is a best effort and may be wider than expected. Ensure your function f
is easily inferrable to have good chances for map
ping it to be inferable as well.